|
Genesis
List of Officers
Constitution
Early in 2003, a small group of women gathered informally
to recognize the distinguished career of Elaine Watson, a 34-year DePaul employee
who had retired from her most recent leadership role as Vice President for Barat
College/Executive Vice President for Operations. The group lamented that Elaine
was one of just a few women in leadership positions at the university, and that
her retirement had left a void. Recognizing that DePaul has virtually no female
faculty and staff on a career-track that would prepare them to fill major leadership
vacancies when they occur, these women were compelled to action.
Led by School for New Learning Dean Susanne Dumbleton, the women formed a committee
and invited others in mid-level positions to discuss the issue further at a
series of meetings held in the ensuing months. To raise the topic among the
entire university community, the committee hosted a daylong conference entitled
“Women in Leadership at DePaul: What Works?” The conference examined
historical and contemporary women leaders at the university, reviewed patterns
of women in academic leadership from a national perspective, and launched strategic
planning for the future. The highly successful event took place Oct. 10, 2003,
attracting more than 200 registrants, from department assistants to vice presidents,
and including nearly a dozen men interested in the advancement of women.
In her keynote address at the conference, Dumbleton noted that the need for
women’s leadership in American higher education is clear. Consider that
while 51.5 percent of the nation’s college students were women and 44
percent of the doctorates in 2002 were awarded to women, only 20.8 percent of
the full professorships and 35 percent of the associate professorships belonged
to women. Women faculty remain clustered in the entry levels, with 54 percent
of the lecturers and 51 percent of instructors being women.
Meanwhile, just 21 percent of America’s university presidents in 2002
were women, and of those presidencies, many were at women-only colleges and
community colleges. These are excellent institutions. However, positions in
the most influential institutions in higher education are generally held by
men.
DePaul’s inclusion of women in key leadership positions is lacking as
well. At the time of the conference, just 20 percent of the university’s
Board of Trustees, zero percent of vice presidents and 33 percent of deans were
women, while 55 percent of our students were women. Such a state fails to advance
the legacy that Louise de Marillac, who in 1633 founded the Daughters of Charity
with Vincent De Paul, left to future generations of women leaders at DePaul.
Moreover, while a 2002 national survey of faculty attitudes shows great commonality
along gender lines, several areas that are essential to future leadership, the
quality of American culture and the realization of mission, are exceptions.
For example, female faculty members by and large value teaching, community,
social justice, diversity, and service at significantly higher rates than their
male colleagues, indicating that female influence is vital to advancing those
issues in the university community. Because men’s and women’s leadership
styles and attitudes differ about important topics that have the ability to
shape an institution, there is significant value in ensuring that both genders
contribute to executive decision-making at DePaul.
A study of practices at universities around the country indicates that training,
mentoring and networking are central to advancing successful participation by
women. These three practices were discussed as priorities at the October conference.
Implementing them will prepare and empower more women to assume top administrative
and academic leadership posts at DePaul and participate in or make executive-level
decisions.
The group made serious progress the following year by becoming an official initiative
of new DePaul President, Father Dennis Holtschneider, C.M., and attracting funding
from the Barat Education Foundation.
In the early years of existence, the group aimed its efforts at leadership,
networking, education and mentoring for the 140 women who are in key leadership
positions at DePaul, WIL’s foremost priority. Plans to engage students
will be developed as WIL matures. Participation was strong at events centered
on these themes, with some networking and education lunches reaching capacity
within hours of registration opening. Combined attendance at events held in
2004 was approximately 200. WIL received positive feedback from events and enthusiastic
encouragement to enhance further the network developing among women at DePaul
and support the advancement of women at the university.
Events and activities for 2005-06 continue to focus on networking, education
and mentoring.
 |
President
Denise Mattson
Associate Vice President, Public Relations
312/362-6225
dmattson@depaul.edu |
| |
|
 |
President Elect
Peggy
Burke Associate Vice President, Student Advancement
312/362-5658 pburke@depaul.edu |
| |
|
 |
Jay Braatz
Chief of Staff to the President
312/362-8890
jbraatz@depaul.edu |
| |
|
 |
Judy
Bundra Associate Dean, School of Music
773/325-1037 jbundra@depaul.edu |
| |
|
 |
Mary Finger
Senior Vice President, Advancement
312/362-7152
mfinger@depaul.edu |
| |
|
 |
Carol Montgomery Associate Vice
President, Career Services & Financial Planning
312/362-5361 cmontgo1@depaul.edu |
| |
|
 |
Elizabeth
Ortiz Senior Executive, Institutional Diversity
312/362-8588 eortiz4@depaul.edu |
| |
|
 |
Barbara Schaffer
Director, Sexual Harassment Policy Office Professor, English 773/325-7496
bschaffe@depaul.edu |
DePaul WIL has focused its efforts on preparing and supporting
women in top-level leadership roles at the university. To that end, it formalized
its organization with a constitution that guides the organization toward its
main goal.
|