Initiating a Complaint: A judicial action may be initiated by any member of the DePaul community (student, faculty, or staff) who feels that he/she has been adversely affected by a student's actions in violation of the Code of Student Responsibility or other policy, or who has reasonable cause to believe that a student has violated the Code of Student Responsibility or other policy.
Complaints shall be made in writing to the Dean of Students Office or other appropriate office.
Relationship Between the Judicial Review Process & Legal Proceedings: A student may be subject to the Judicial Review Process in addition to any civil or criminal proceedings. The University, in its sole discretion, will make the decision whether or not to delay the Judicial Review Process until the conclusion of any civil or criminal action associated with a complaint. If a referred student chooses not to participate in the Judicial Review Process because of a pending legal action, the hearing officer may render a decision based solely on the written documentation and/or the complainant’s testimony available at the time without the benefit of information from the referred student.
The Judicial Review Process is designed to be educational, not legal, in nature. Rules of evidence and discovery do not apply to the Judicial Review Process. Students should not draw parallel interpretations between the Code of Student Responsibility or other DePaul policies and criminal or civil law. The outcome of a legal proceeding is not determinative on the Judicial Review Process.
Delivery of Written Notices: All written notices regarding judicial actions will be delivered personally or via the postal service or email. It is a student’s responsibility to ensure that his/her information (including address, phone number and email) is current in Campus Connect.
Initial Review: Upon a written complaint that an alleged violation has occurred, the Dean of Students Office or other designated office shall conduct an initial review.
At the time of the initial review, the student will be given the following:
- A written statement of the alleged violations in sufficient enough detail to enable the student to prepare a defense.
- Reasonable access to information specific to one’s case.
- An explanation of, and opportunity to ask questions about the Judicial Review Process, including (a) an explanation of the two hearing possibilities (Administrative Hearing and Judicial Board Hearing) and the University's determination as to which type of hearing will be conducted; (b) an explanation of "Important Aspects of the Judicial Review Process;" (c) an explanation of possible sanctions; and (d) an explanation of appeal procedures.
- Instructions on how to schedule the appropriate hearing.
- Information regarding any interim sanctions, if applicable.
The initial review will include a determination as to whether the University has jurisdiction over the violation. (See Explanation of Important Aspects of the Judicial Review Process—Jurisdiction.) This initial review could consist of requesting additional information from the complainant or referred student, or otherwise collecting additional information. This initial review is intended only to provide information pertinent to the incident under review and is not designed to result in a binding decision. The designated reviewer will take reasonable measures to ensure that the initial review is completed within 5 business days of the date of written complaint that a violation has occurred. However, the University reserves the right to extend this time limit, in its sole discretion, in order to ensure a proper initial review of all relevant material.
If the referred student acknowledges that a violation, or the conduct giving rise to a violation, has occurred at any time during the initial review, the process may immediately move to the sanction process. These sanctions may be appealed in accordance with the procedures detailed in the Judicial Appeals Procedures.
Initiating a Hearing: If, after the initial review, the designated reviewer determines that there is not reasonable cause to believe that the allegation has occurred, the review shall promptly cease and no record of the complaint shall be retained in the student’s judicial file.
If, after the initial review, the designated reviewer determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that a violation of policy has occurred, the Judicial Review Process will move forward.
Interim Sanctions: In order to protect the health, safety, security and well-being of the University community and its members, the University reserves the right to immediately impose interim sanctions upon a student when it determines, in its sole discretion, that the continued presence of the referred student does any of the following:
- constitutes a threat to the safety or well-being of the referred student, any other member of the University community, or any invited guest;
- risks destruction of property; or
- risks disruption of classroom or other campus activities.
A final determination of the charges against any student suspended or otherwise sanctioned on an interim basis shall be made through appropriate hearing procedures within 10 business days of such suspension. During this time the referred student shall forfeit those rights and privileges as the University deems appropriate. Should it be found that the student did not commit the act(s), the interim sanction shall be revoked.
Prior Record of Sanctions: Because a student’s prior record of conduct will be used as a basis for more stringent judicial action, previous sanctioned violations in the student’s judicial file may be considered before assigning any judicial sanction(s). Any previously imposed sanctions may provide additional justification that more strict action is necessary to ensure that the student understands the full impact his/her pattern of behavior is having on the DePaul community.
Failure to Participate: Failure of a student to agree to, appear at, or participate in a hearing, or to otherwise disrupt the normal hearing process, may in itself constitute a violation. The University reserves the right to pursue this additional violation in the same or a separate hearing. If a referred student chooses not to have the hearing process explained, chooses not to participate in the hearing process, or otherwise fails to appear at a hearing, the hearing officer may render a decision and if appropriate, impose sanctions based solely on the information available at the time without the benefit of information from the referred student. These sanctions may be appealed in accordance with the procedures detailed in Judicial Appeals Procedures.
Standard for Hearing Determinations: The standard of “whether it is more likely than not that the alleged violation(s) has/have occurred” will be the basis for conducting any hearing and imposing any sanctions.